Continuous Testing: Required, But Not Enough

CI/CD Testing Table Stakes taken Next Level

Testing is often ignored when talking about agile, CI/CD and DevOps. And yet, testing is often a major bottleneck in these endeavors. To be successful in any of the above, test must be part of the culture, something done continuously at every build.

Ignoring testing in CI/CD is both unfortunate and unnecessary, as testing can be kicked-off at every build by most CI tools, including Jenkins, TeamCity, Travis CI, Go CD, Bamboo, GitLab CI, CircleCI and Codeship. Or course, this assumes your test automation system integrates with your CI tooling, as Appvance IQ does.

Given that, creating a culture and workflow of ALWAYS testing at each build is straight forward: No build goes forward without executing the test suite.

According to the all-knowing Wikipedia (but mostly based on our own experience), Continuous Testing must include the validation of both functional and non-functional requirements.

For testing functional requirements (functional testing), Continuous Testing often involves unit tests, API testing, integration testing, and system testing. For testing non-functional requirements, one must determine if the build meets expectations around performance, security and, potentially, compliance. Tests should provide the earliest possible detection of the risks that are most critical for the business or organization that is releasing the software.

So Continuous Testing should be table-stakes. Now let’s think about Continuous Testing in relation to regression testing, which should be continuous, automated, and achieve close to 100% test coverage of user activities. This is a real challenge for most shops, and where the new realm of AI Scripting comes into play. Adding AI Scripting into the mix takes Continuous Testing to the next level: automatic regression testing. (See the recently updated AI-Generated Regression Testing page for more on this important topic.)

Appvance IQ helps achieve all of the above, as it integrates with popular CI tools to kick off tests at each build, and immediately returns results. It was created for a Continuous Testing culture, so tests can be run across all functional and non-functional domains from the same system, using essentially the same scripts. And AI Scripting generates thousands of tests automatically, based on user activities, driving nearly 100% user driven test coverage.

So when it comes to regression testing, add together Continuous Testing with AI Scripting to get the very best regression testing possible.

Want to see Continuous Testing taken to the next level, request a personal live demo here.

Recent Blog Posts

Read Other Recent Articles

Rethinking Outdated QA KPIs for the Autonomous Era For years, QA teams have measured success using a familiar set of metrics: test case counts, automation percentage, defect leakage, and execution time. These KPIs made sense when testing was largely manual and automation scaled linearly with human effort. But AI-first QA changes the math. When automation

There is a quiet truth in enterprise QA right now. Many teams feel let down. For the last several years, vendors have promised an AI revolution in testing. Autonomous agents. Self healing frameworks. Copilots that would “change everything.” Yet when you talk to QA leaders privately, the story is different. Productivity has barely moved. Script

APIs are the backbone of modern software. From microservices and mobile apps to cloud platforms and third-party integrations, APIs power nearly every critical interaction in today’s applications. Yet for many QA teams, API testing remains slow, manual, and incomplete—often treated as a separate effort from UI testing, or skipped altogether under delivery pressure. In an

Empower Your Team. Unleash More Potential. See What AIQ Can Do For Your Business

footer cta image
footer cta image