Blog

For decades, test automation has promised speed, efficiency, and confidence. But the truth is, traditional “automation” has remained heavily manual—requiring teams to write, maintain, and endlessly update brittle test scripts. It’s time-consuming, expensive, and often breaks under the pressure of rapid software changes. Enter AI-first QA. Platforms like Appvance IQ (AIQ) are ushering in a

Enterprises today are under immense pressure to release software faster, with fewer bugs, and at a lower cost. But traditional QA approaches—whether manual or semi-automated—simply can’t keep up. Between the cost of scripting, test maintenance, and regression cycles, software testing has become one of the most expensive bottlenecks in the SDLC. That’s where Appvance IQ

Let’s be honest: traditional test automation was never truly automated. Writing scripts manually—or even recording them—has always been human-driven, slow, and prone to maintenance nightmares. That ends with AI Script Generation (AISG). AISG flips the script—literally. Instead of relying on testers to decide what to cover, it uses advanced AI models to learn your entire

AI copilots sound like magic: type what you want, and they “help” build tests. But here’s the dirty secret: for experienced QA engineers, copilots often slow you down. Typing instructions into a prompt instead of simply recording steps can be 2x slower. Worse, copilots generate partial test coverage, leaving senior testers to reverse-engineer gaps later.

For decades, QA has been the silent bottleneck in software delivery—manual, slow, and costly. Even with test automation tools, enterprises still spend 60–70% of QA time writing, editing, and maintaining scripts. Worse, despite all that effort, critical bugs still slip into production, where they cost exponentially more to fix and erode customer trust. But AI-first

There’s a dangerous myth circulating in the QA industry: that any AI is good AI. Tool vendors are racing to slap on “AI” features—copilots, agents, test case creators—all in an effort to look modern. But beneath the flashy UI and prompt-driven wizardry is a hard truth: these tools are actually slowing down experienced QA professionals. And there’s now